UK strikes. Another winter of discontent? Damp Squid says PM :)

By : Administrator
Published 30th November 2011 |
Read latest comment - 1st December 2011

Wasn't going to post, can already feel the blood pressure rising...

So public sector workers walking out on strike and causing the rest of us chaos.

Few people doubt the fact that Nurses and teachers do a superb job and for not enough pay, but when it comes to pensions, personally I think it's time for a reality check. The country can't afford the current pension commitments and we are broke. UK PLC is a sinking ship and is up to its eyes in debt.

They still have a pretty good pension scheme compared to most of us in the private sector (those that have pensions!) so do we really need Union orchestrated walk outs that impact the rest of us? Lets face it, the majority of people are already struggling or fed up with the ongoing financial doom and gloom, without having to use up valuable holiday to stay at home with the kids because the schools shut
BBC News - Public sector strike to be 'largest for a generation'

Hmm, has the potential for a rant, but shall leave in business news

So what does anyone else think? Am I spouting Tory rhetoric and should be burnt at the stake or does anyone else see the current pension crisis as unsustainable and the strikes as an annoying sideshow?

Steve Richardson
Gaffer of My Local Services
My Local Services | Me on LinkedIn
Comments
Wouldn't dream of having a go at you Steve ....

However, I think Maggie took us down the wrong turning in 1979 (by and large) and no government since has tried to repair the economic and social damage she did.

Maggie set up the long term destruction of the value of the state pension scheme(s). The continuing decline in the state pension makes the employer-supported pension (if you have one and if it's a decent and secure scheme) even more critical to everyone of working age.

The public sector pension scheme has been both decent and secure; it's also actuarially affordable.

Stupidly, governments have also allowed employer-supported pensions in the private sector to decline.

Private pensions are costly and will cover only a very small minority of those who can expect to need support in their old age. thumbsdown

Huge numbers (perhaps the majority of UK citizens) face poverty in their old age. They'll be claiming benefits but benefit levels aren't high enough to meet their basic bills.

I want those striking to protect their public pensions to win, in their interests and mine.

If they win, it'll put a little more pressure on private sector employers to keep on funding their pension schemes and maybe even improve them.

It'll reduce - directly and indirectly - the future numbers reliant on taxpayer-funded means tested benefits.

It'll increase the spending power of the OAP part of the lower income bracket, resulting in more sales to local businesses and a more stable national economy.

So how do I end this diatribe? Should I shout "Power to the people" or "Everybody out!"?????????

Linda
CareersPartnershipUK

lol I'm only partially Thatcherite...

Unfortunately decades of poor planning from progressive goverments and an ever increasing dependence culture on benefits has bled the country dry
If they win, it'll put a little more pressure on private sector employers to keep on funding their pension schemes and maybe even improve them.

It'll reduce - directly and indirectly - the future numbers reliant on taxpayer-funded means tested benefits.

It'll increase the spending power of the OAP part of the lower income bracket, resulting in more sales to local businesses and a more stable national economy.

Sounds great, but do you think that's a realistic scenario? Me and you are small business owners, so that makes us private sector employers, so should we bear the burden on pension schemes? If it's capped per number of employees, then you end up with companies not wanting to recruit.

In the mean time how does UK PLC fund the current pension schemes if there are no reforms? Forget Greece and Spain, we're broke

But can see both sides, as the wifes pension is under threat, but being public sector, she can't strike as she's currently on a second bout of 12 months maternity leave which was very generous, and makes my toes curl if we had to provide the same generous package in the private sector!

Steve Richardson
Gaffer of My Local Services
My Local Services | Me on LinkedIn

Me and you are small business owners, so that makes us private sector employers, so should we bear the burden on pension schemes?


Not really ... I think the cheapest and safest way to provide adequate pensions for all is to go for a relatively high state pension (funded by taxing employee and employer according to ability to pay). This approach stops us wasting money on expensive private pensions and is the best protection we have against fraud (remember Maxwell?) and other corporate disasters affecting retirement income.

I want a political about-turn on pensions (and almost certainly won't get it!).

Unfortunately decades of poor planning from progressive governments and an ever increasing dependence culture on benefits has bled the country dry



I see things differently. I feel our governments have been mainly regressive (not progressive) but above all, they haven't been competent. Governments have presided over a continuing slide in the country's ability to earn its living in a global world and in the life chances of UK middle-income and low-income citizens. They've wasted money hand over fist. thumbsdownthumbsdown

Linda
CareersPartnershipUK

This Thread is now closed for comments