So how do you feel about Oldham Athletic hiring convicted rapist Ched Evans?
He is adamant he is innocent, was convicted and served a prison sentence, and now released.
Should he be barred now from pursuing his previous career now he has been released from society, or should he be punished further?
Removing emotion and the obvious sentiment that the victim will be paying for his crime for a lot longer than he has, it does generate and interesting conundrum.
The justice system (rightly or wrongly) deems him to have paid his penalty and has released him back into society. Should that carry caveats or is it just because he is a sports person?
Club sponsors and sections of the media seem to think he needs more punishment, along with the club for hiring him.
Or should he be made to stack shelves in Tesco or maybe live on benefits (paid by us)?
Would there be the same issue and publicity if he was a high paid programmer and was about to get a job with Google or Microsoft? Or maybe if he was convicted of tax avoidance rather than a sexual crime?
Completely baffled why the Prime Minister has now stuck his oar in:
David Cameron expects that any football club considering hiring convicted rapist Ched Evans will "weigh their decisions very carefully", Downing Street has said.
Guess this is the reality of the modern age and Trial by Media.
What do you think?