Pension Auto-enrolment

By : Administrator
Published 1st June 2015 |
Read latest comment - 18th September 2015

Have you been contacted yet by the pensions regulator?

I got my brown letter this morning:

"The law on workplace pensions has changed. Every employer with at least one member of staff must automatically enrol those who are eligible into a workplace pension scheme and contribute towards it"

In otherwords, anyone who has an employee who earns over £10k per year will now have the right to a workplace pension which the employer (you) needs to contribute to.

Ignoring it will land you in hot water with fines from the Pensions Regulator.

As this is a massive administrative change, it is being rolled out in stages. Big business has been dealt with first, and now us smaller fish are being allocated "staging dates" when we need to be compliant and the law comes into effect. For us, we have a staging date of October 2016, so there is no immediate panic, but you do need to start preparing.

Must admit, I'm not really up to speed on the in's and out's or what the costs will mean. I've heard figures of £300 - £600 a year bandied about, but this is going to be dependant on salaries. I need to appoint a nominated pensions contact by the 30th June, I assume then I'll find out more information about actual costs.

I nominate my accountant!

Team meeting tomorrow - on the agenda, salary reduction to under £10k and redundancies

I can see the idea behind it, as the state pension will dwindle away to nothing in the decades to come. But in reality, any loading or increase of contributions will be carried by the employee, as I suspect most employers will factor this in to the salary costs.

So has anyone else received theirs yet, and are you in the process of getting it sorted out, or are you waiting for Pension police to catch up with you? Any thoughts about the scheme, good or bad?

For anyone worried, here is a link to the Pension Regulator website


Steve Richardson
Gaffer of My Local Services
My Local Services | Me on LinkedIn
Comments

The cheapest, safest way to fund pensions people can afford to retire on is through the basic State Retirement Pension.  That option scares the hell out of the politicians because it means raising taxes now to safeguard everyone's future.

Not sure of my "facts" here but I think I'm right ...  I remember reading that if Maggie Thatcher had left the pension scheme in as good a state as it was when she got elected, the State Pension would now be generous enough to do without paying anyone means-tested Pension Credits!  About a third of today's pensioners are dependent on the means-tested Pension Credit, I believe. 

  


Linda
CareersPartnershipUK

With the population growing older, the expectation of quality cradle to grave care, I honestly don't know how the state will afford to be paying pensions, 15, 20, 25 years in the future. I can see this gradually moving to a private pension system with a some kind of state safety net for the needy. The only thing that would worry me would be employers going bust or spending pension pots as has happened in recent years.


Angela
My views & opinions are my own

The problem with pensions, is generally when they are sold 'the seller' normally a financial advisor or broker is on a commission, they will generally only have half a dozen products that they promote on their books. So only offering you limited choice. I'm guessing all pensions schemes are invested over time on the stock market, most sales reps, sorry financial advisors will show you glossy charts with outstanding performance results from the last 5 years or so to suck you in.... What they wont remind you about is the stock market crash of 2008 nor the recession that followed. So any performance results will be misleading as they couldn't get any lower after the crash, only up. Governments over time change the rules regarding pensions, so whatever todays Government is saying about how safe your pension contributions will be, in 15 or 20 years time when the pension pots are overflowing with cash, you can bet your life that if the Government needs that money or decides to tax it differently it will.....


Thanks,
Barney

I honestly don't know how the state will afford to be paying pensions, 15, 20, 25 years in the future.
 

The truly scary thing is that it's far, far cheaper for the state to collect pension contributions and pay out pensions than to rely on private pension providers doing the same thing.  

If we can't afford for the state to do this, then the only other option we have is to accept most future OAPs won't be able to afford to eat, heat their homes or pay for basic home maintenance.  Many families won't have enough "spare" money to subsidise their "wrinklies" even if they wanted to; so what happens then?

The pensions auto-enrolment project was designed to safeguard future "wrinklies" from a dire, poverty-stricken old age.  What I've seen in the financial press suggests it won't work because too few people are themselves earning enough money in permanent jobs to pay in adequate contributions for an adequate length of time; and the contribution made by their employers is too low to make up the deficit.    


Linda
CareersPartnershipUK

Everyone aware now of the new Pension auto-enrolment?

If you are still confused or don't understand it, the Guardian has an easy to read article all about it: Pension auto-enrolment – what business owners need to know

 


Steve Richardson
Gaffer of My Local Services
My Local Services | Me on LinkedIn

This Thread is now closed for comments