forum avatar

Job Hoppers Are Better Employees?

By
Published 26th April 2010 |
Read latest comment - 27th April 2010

I read an interesting article today that said that job hoppers (people who spend an average of 18 months per job) are actually better employees. It said they have better loyalty (while they are there), better production and better motivation. It also said that people who stayed in a job too long become unmotivated and unproductive. What are your thoughts?
Comments
Bedlam,

I've removed your link, Steve advised you of the process earlier this month.

In regards to job-hoppers I think the answer would also depend on what industry these people are in.

Some occupations take a while to train people so whilst the enthusiasm may be there there could still be the lack of skills. It could prove costly to keep training people.

It all comes down to the individual, some are naturally more motivated than others but I can see how some people could become stagnant if stuck in the same job and not enjoying it.

What are your thoughts on this?

It does make sense. In larger companies, there is a big element of comfort factor, with people plodding along.

I don't know about 18 months, but I'd say most people interested in developing their careers or generally ambitious tend to jump ship every 2 - 3 years, or at least move roles or departments. After all, as an employee, the biggest payrise you get is normally the one when you walk through the front door.

All depends on the job role I suppose.

Steve Richardson
Gaffer of My Local Services
My Local Services | Me on LinkedIn

I always used to have a strict 12 month rule get in complete a big project and move on the next big companyproject it kept me mega sharp on my product knowledge but as the size of the projects I signed up for got bigger and bigger you cant really apply that rule.

Stavros

I see 2 years as a good test. Year 1, get to know the place and how everything works and understand what is needed to progress. Year 2, do what you need to do, get the money / promotion and move on.

Saying that I've been at the day job for 8 years now, having started on a 6 month contract.

Credit-Manager.Net

Saying that I've been at the day job for 8 years now, having started on a 6 month contract.

Spotted a flaw to your theory Sean

Steve Richardson
Gaffer of My Local Services
My Local Services | Me on LinkedIn

Spotted a flaw to your theory Sean

I know, everytime I try to leave they throw more money around.. bad sports if you ask me... they know my weakness, the kids and toysrus.

Credit-Manager.Net

110% agree (hate anything over 100 so don't know why I said that)

The only exception (IMHO) is when working for yourself. Two years is pushing it as an employee to ensure a fully motivated and hard working person. Prefer 12-18 months to get the best out of an individual.

Mike

bonsai passion

This Thread is now closed for comments