Aesthetics vs necessity - Drip feed diets. 23rd November 2012 7:20 AM
I just finished reading this post over at the telegraph and to say the least, I'm shocked. You know that people that actually use this diet are subjected to a nasal tube that feeds a protein rich liquid directly to the stomach (at about 260 calories).
I think its ghastly that someone would want to put themselves through that, for whatever reasons. But they say it seems to work and people lose about 11lb every ten days (dang).
You can read the rest here
What happened to the good old days when you had to walk, exercise and watch what you eat? What do you think about this? Would you opt in for this sort of treatment?
I think its ghastly that someone would want to put themselves through that, for whatever reasons. But they say it seems to work and people lose about 11lb every ten days (dang).
You can read the rest here
“The KEN diet provides just 260 calories a day - all derived from 65g of protein.
Participants are allowed to disconnect the tube for half an hour at most, for the odd luxury like a sugar-free herbal tea.
The diet is already being offered on Harley Street and Porter feared other clinics could follow.”
Participants are allowed to disconnect the tube for half an hour at most, for the odd luxury like a sugar-free herbal tea.
The diet is already being offered on Harley Street and Porter feared other clinics could follow.”
What happened to the good old days when you had to walk, exercise and watch what you eat? What do you think about this? Would you opt in for this sort of treatment?
