Dreamraven : Forum Moderator 28th January 2013 12:50 PM |
“I know Microsoft have made some mistakes over the years, but backwards compatibility isn't one of them. WOW64 (windows on windows) allows the 64bit machine to run 32bit apps. In the server world we found 64bit really useful as it could natively address memory > 4GB without using stuff like AWE (address windowing extensions).
NT wasn't bad apart from DirectX and USB support, miles better than 95, 98 or ME. I think XP was one of the best to come out of Redmond (and DOS 3.3). Not tried Windows 8 yet as quite happy with Win 7 on the laptop.”
NT wasn't bad apart from DirectX and USB support, miles better than 95, 98 or ME. I think XP was one of the best to come out of Redmond (and DOS 3.3). Not tried Windows 8 yet as quite happy with Win 7 on the laptop.”
Not too sure about 7 atm either lol. spent about ten minutes arguing with it about which of my adsl accounts to connect to. I have a back up in place when my bandwidth runs out, and today it just blatantly refused.

Workstation..... manually searching for peripherals to add them to the OS. Although, XP was also built on NT though, was just a lot more plug and play than the original NT, with a much better GUI, so I can understand where some of XP's stability came from. I can remember formatting hard drives using the NTFS system.

Even in my training, The furthest they went back was 95, and they only touched on it. They focussed mainly on Vista and XP, seeing it was the most used at the time. (Vista was still in its infancy though).
Thanks,
Dreamraven