Should rape suspects be named before the trial? 12th October 2011 4:22 PM
“The court should be the ones that decide on these cases. The decision on whether the individuals names should be publish should be made by the judges.”
I slightly disagree - not everyone can afford to get an injunction to stop their name being published in a paper of an alleged crime.
We tend to have an attitude of no smoke without fire, thus if the paper suggests someone may have committed an offence we automatically think they are guilty. God forbid i get accused tomorrow of a crime i didn't commit, mistaken identity for example, how many people would assume i was guilty if my name was published?
Im all for anonymity until proven Guilty by Trail, then publish away but no-one should be prejudged.
Think MRB mentioned earlier the case of Matthew Kelly - he was not even charged in the end but anyone remember the cringe worthy interview when Frank Skinner said Kelly looked like a peodo, it was awful.